The truth about health supplements

Scientist VTB test and goes over medical benefits and claimed truths of today’s health supplements.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Best Natural Health Supplements 4Life Transfer Factor Tri-Factor How to Care for Leopard Geckos : Leopard Gecko Health Supplements The secret of Garlic for your health

25 Responses to “The truth about health supplements”

  1. LEATHERrebelJUSTICE on September 24th, 2009 at 10:20 pm

    4-The “STFU DUMBASS” was a great case against me but just saying im wrong with out much explanation will win the trust of anyone.5-

  2. LEATHERrebelJUSTICE on September 24th, 2009 at 10:21 pm

    5-I suggest you try harder. You could say i have a bioest against naturalist due to the fact im very supportive of the prescription world. You could say I might have tried the products in the wrong way.6-

  3. LEATHERrebelJUSTICE on September 24th, 2009 at 10:22 pm

    6-You could say my brain and is to tolerant to chemicals due to massive and onward drug use. Many people believe these supplements work so what i did is show real people using so people could get an idea of if it would effect them the same way.7-

  4. LEATHERrebelJUSTICE on September 24th, 2009 at 10:24 pm

    7-commenting on utube is so broken. That guy wasn’t even attacking me that hard but im board and i have to beat utube cause posting these took all day.

  5. You look like a real reputable fuckin source.

    Complete lack of logic and zero knowledge of the scientific method.

    Herbal supplements are bullshit though.

    Go to the fucking dentist.

  6. LEATHERrebelJUSTICE on September 25th, 2009 at 9:31 pm

    1-So if you were going to try a supplement you’d prefer not to hear someones opinion on it. A scientific study will include better tests, however the words “scientist have discovered” works as 1 of the most powerful propaganda tools. Just like asking a friend will hold more weight than public opinion. My video shows what 1-4 people think of some products, Unless im hiding some alternate agenda, all your seeing is a few people who using these products with no result 2-

  7. LEATHERrebelJUSTICE on September 25th, 2009 at 9:32 pm

    2-which would be pretty telling if you knew them in person. This video shows the peak of yelling and dressing up cause it was an early one. My obnoxious way of being gets across to the people that i am the same type of person who would give these products a try. The idea is to get to know me and my opinion to gain trust in the future. The last thing i would do is lie cause eventually it would be exposed in the future.3-

  8. LEATHERrebelJUSTICE on September 25th, 2009 at 9:53 pm

    3-for battling purposes a response would be in order. Dentist, reptile, ehh. The only part worth responding to is the 2 words you found “scientific method.” Its obvious with the resources i have of maybe 5 test subjects and 1 or 2 sources for the product, the amount of testing i do is limited. That doesnt discredit my conclusions sense the point of looking up drugs on utube is to get real peoples opinions.Which are often tainted by peoples high expectations.

  9. You throw around a lot of numbers for a person with no experimental basis for any of your information.

    Not one person is going to take a white guy with dreadlocks seriously. The rest of the shit you do just ensures it.

    Your terrible fucking reply shows how dumb you are. Sense? Your?

    I’ll give you this… Anyone that is stupid enough to come to youTube to look for peoples opinions on drugs, just may be dumb enough to appreciate your incoherent banter.

  10. LEATHERrebelJUSTICE on September 27th, 2009 at 1:30 am

    -Dreadlocks work as the free card to be taken seriously by the kind of people who take health supplements.
    -”Terrible reply” isn’t that substantive without explaining why. again “dumb” and “terrible” are insults that are already implied. Stating general insults only leaves a response of not true.
    -You state that I have no experimental basis for any of my information. Im guessing you meant scientific or logical cause experimental basis would still cover any experiment no matter how stupid.

  11. No, dreads on a white guy work as a free card for everyone to know just how bad of judgment you have.

    Also let people know that you are too lazy to wash your hair, probably too lazy to bath, smoke a lot of pot, and are proud of all of the above for no reason at all.

    Without use of the scientific method, it is not an experiment, no matter if you say it is or not.

  12. LEATHERrebelJUSTICE on September 27th, 2009 at 6:18 pm

    (Sep 27 part 1)
    The 1st two statements of yours make sense if you dont take into account the group im talking to. Even though i dont plan to only make videos that are credible to chamomile nazis who claim to make out to gia on a regular basis, those are still the largest group of customers who buy these rip off supplements.
    There is no doubt multiple definitions of experiment which usually apply to what the average person will use the word for. Example 2-

  13. LEATHERrebelJUSTICE on September 27th, 2009 at 6:20 pm

    (Sep 27 part 2)
    2- “Im seeing if my shit doesn’t stink on days that I call people on definitions, next week ill test if my shit stink is reduced even further if i actually have the definition right.”
    I could locate key parts of some definitions of experiment you could be hung up on but they still wont include scientific method sense experiment is a component in what scientific method is. 3-

  14. LEATHERrebelJUSTICE on September 27th, 2009 at 6:21 pm

    (Sep 27 part 3)
    3- Having said that, it would make no sense to expect an at home video maker to live up to the highest guidelines for any test you can find. Notable to make clear cause your steering towards the direction of faulting me on things like not having 500 test subjects. Furthermore I state here and may god or another youtube viewer hang me by my balls if im wrong, I did live up to the highest test procedures given the resources shown in the video, making it a good job experiment wise.

  15. Look up sense/since in the fucking dictionary.

    You didnt do an experiment, you make flagrant assumptions from a shittily designed observation. You have no empirical evidence, you have no experiment. I am sure your shit stinks all the time, but SINCE you dont have a control, it isnt an experiment either.

    Did you drop out or something? These are really elementary principals here.

  16. LEATHERrebelJUSTICE on September 28th, 2009 at 5:54 pm

    (sep 28 -1)You found a grammatical error, I use spell check a lot to. 2. too. I thought you were attacking the way i conduct tests rather than grammar. Arguing about if you scored a point over me not having spelling common sense is less important than you still using the word experiment wrong. Better to miss type than to be wrong.
    -You are now using bigger words wrong to step up your game. Empirical refers to observations obtained from an experiment. 2-

  17. LEATHERrebelJUSTICE on September 28th, 2009 at 5:55 pm

    (sep 28 -2)Again no matter how bad an experiment is and how flagrant the observations are. bigger words like flagrant are still as non substantive as saying bad, maybe you should explain why they are flagrant. Lets get to an actual attack of how i did the tests without just saying they were bad.
    -Its legitimate to say the tests did not have a double blind or any placebo tests. However this is clear from before you even click on the thumbnail. 3-

  18. LEATHERrebelJUSTICE on September 28th, 2009 at 5:58 pm

    (sep 28 -3)
    Is a test worthless if someone only has around 3 test subjects? Less worthless than asking 1 friend if a drug works. You got me that if I had 50 test sub, i could have done better. But to verify that the most basic effects claimed didnt happen on 12 or so drugs, It would make sense to assume that they probably dont work.

  19. dude i used to have dreadz……..whats your problem with dreadz? and why do you think only non white people can have dreadz?………thats just racist

  20. Yeah, well I think it is disrespectful to Rasta heritage for a lameass punk buttfuck white guy to have dreads, so fuck you Juggalo.

    Or do I have to add some Z’s so you understandz?

  21. 1 You are an uneducated fuck with weak and incorrect usage of the English language and an incoherent speaking style.

    You are utterly fucking clueless about anything scientific, and are stuck confusing experiments with observational studies. That doesnt really matter, because you do not do either. Looking up random, wrong, opinionated “information” on internet sites is not a fucking experiment or study, it is just fucking stupid.

    Seriously, you clearly have the internet……

  22. USE IT to look up the definition for some of these words that you throw around like dead cats in a sack.

    If you are going to shoot down bullshit, unsubstantiated, unscientific claims, at least have the ambition to learn HOW one would go about testing a hypothesis before you go ranting and fucking yelling about how ginseng takers are retarded.

    Your lack of cited sources OR evidence makes you as ridiculous as the people you so arrogantly fail to prove wrong.

    Shut the fuck up, go to school.

  23. lmfao your retarded…….it is in no way disrespectful

    rastas aint the onlyones with dreadlockZZZZZZZ

    i know some rastaz n they could give a fuck less what a white guys hair looks like……..so duck you leaky bitch

  24. yes i said it once and ill say it again Duck you…….duck you and duck everyone thats cool with you…….DUCK you

    i knew you were gonna point that out so i did it myself……..duck off bitch

  25. Oh, and 10-20% of people have a ragweed allergy.

Leave a Reply